Reduced energy output
Resistance increases in corroded connections and frames lower power generation. p>
Solar installations face harsh environments that accelerate corrosion of frames, mounting structures, electrical connections, and grounding. Proactive assessment and mitigation preserve safety, uptime, and lifecycle ROI.
Corrosion threatens energy yield, increases maintenance, and introduces electrical and fire hazards in solar plants. Using corrosion-resistant materials, coatings, and scheduled inspections helps reduce downtime and maximize ROI over the plant lifecycle.
Solar infrastructure—frames, supports, fasteners, conductors, and grounding—operates outdoors under UV, salt-laden air, dust, and moisture. Without proactive protection, degradation accelerates and jeopardizes performance and safety.
Resistance increases in corroded connections and frames lower power generation. p>
Frequent servicing and replacements raise OPEX. p>
Failures cause generation interruptions and revenue loss. p>
Compromised grounding and hot joints elevate risk and liability. p>
Shortened service life drives avoidable capex. p>
More waste from early component turnover undermines sustainability goals. p>
Industry estimates indicate corrosion costs power generation billions annually—driven by maintenance, replacements, productivity loss, delays, and litigation—highlighting the importance of prevention in solar assets.
Materials selection, protective coatings, and maintenance practices per NACE best-practices. p>
Protect grounding components to preserve conductivity and reliability. p>
Corrosion-resistant connectors/inverters reduce losses and fire risk. p>
Barrier design and compatibility for Al/Steel/Cu interfaces. p>
Tailored to coastal, desert, and high-humidity sites; validated via NACE test methods. p>
Ongoing assessment of corrosion rates to protect large arrays. p>
Durable finishes plus inspection planning to maintain protection. p>
Our process applies industry-leading NACE practices: survey environment and structures, select compatible prevention solutions (materials/coatings/cathodic protection where applicable), and implement a monitoring plan including LPR to track corrosion rates over time.
Model corrosion behaviour for design and mitigation planning. p>
Quantify wall loss for remaining life estimates. p>
Assess current corrosion state of equipment via open-circuit potential. p>
Half-cell techniques evaluate rebar corrosion in piles and pedestals. p>
Depth assessment to gauge corrosion risk to reinforcement. p>
Combine measurements and exposure to forecast service life. p>
After seven years in service, ~30% of 3,600 module mounts were severely corroded—threatening mechanical integrity. Root causes included underspecified galvanizing, overlooked chloride exposure, and inadequate procurement evaluation; many concrete piles had cracked with heavily corroded steel. We identified key factors, specified suitable coatings, and set an inspection plan to recover the intended 25-year life.
Send site location, array design, materials, and any known issues. We’ll confirm the assessment scope, monitoring cadence, and mitigation roadmap.